Max Moody
UncommittedRankings sourced from 247Sports, ESPN, On3, and Rivals. Learn how we aggregate data →
Scout Report
A 6-1 point guard with a national ranking of #124 in the class of 2028 and no reported offers sits in a murky spot. Recruiting boards put a number on him, but the number doesn't tell a coach how he plays. That gap is the story right now.
Background
The file places Max Moody at South Oak Cliff, where he plays alongside Jonathan Bradley, a 2027 point guard ranked #271 nationally who has committed to Chattanooga. Hometown, family, and AAU history aren't documented in this profile yet, so anything beyond the school and that teammate relationship would be guesswork. Coaches who want the full picture should pull those details directly from his program.
Playing Style
The profile doesn't include game film notes, tempo data, or possession-level breakdowns, so there's no reliable read on how he pushes pace, how he handles pick-and-roll, or how he defends the ball. Playing at the same school as a higher-profile point guard is worth noting, since it raises questions about how the two share the floor and who runs the offense in which lineups. Those questions are answerable on tape. They aren't answered here. Until someone has watched him in live games, a description of his style would be made up.
Strengths
Nothing specific has been documented about his skill set. The ranking reflects the scouting consensus that has placed him in the top 150 of his class, but the file doesn't say which attributes drove that placement. A coach watching him should look at ball security under pressure, his ability to change speeds, his off-ball habits when Bradley has the ball, and how he finishes around length. Those are the places where a 6-1 guard's value tends to show up, and they're the first things to confirm.
Areas to Watch
The biggest open question is whether he can separate himself from a teammate who is already a recognized college commit. A point guard on that kind of roster has to prove he can play without being the primary ball-handler, and that's a different test than running an offense on his own. Consistency across tournament and showcase settings will matter too, since rankings usually move once a player shows the same level of play against different competition.
Player Comparison
No comparison is supportable from the information provided. Making one would require tape or a detailed skill breakdown that isn't in this profile, and a comp built on height and position alone would mislead more than it helps.
Recruitment
The profile lists no reported offers, but also names Stephen F. Austin as a recent offer two weeks ago. Those two entries conflict, so the SFA offer should be confirmed before it's treated as fact. Mid-major programs are the most likely early market for a player at this ranking, and the timeline for a 2028 class means the bulk of his offers will come after his junior season begins to produce film. No projected landing spot is supportable yet.
Projection
A realistic college ceiling depends on how he develops over the next year or two, and the file doesn't yet contain enough information to place him in a specific tier. A player ranked in this range can land anywhere from a mid-major rotation role to a high-major program, depending on how his game grows and how the market reads him. Pro projection is too far out to assess responsibly at this stage.
Updated Oct 7, 2026 · Analysis by PrepRadar Scouting Team